Why did the new process work in one place and not another?
2026-11-08 · Justin Engel, Driven Intent
You can roll out a new process, one that fixes a glaring problem or weakness, and still watch it go nowhere, and most of us have seen it.
What the research found
In an eight-hospital study, deaths fell after a checklist or new process was implemented, and each site had a local lead and hospital backing. When one province later required the same checklist everywhere, no significant drop appeared. The form alone isn't what makes it work.
Haynes et al. (2009); Urbach et al. (2014)
What this means on a Monday
In my view, a new process needs an owner who is also a champion and has a stake in seeing it successfully used. That is why every change in Initiative Playbook has a named owner and a decision at the end.
Try this Monday: pick one new process your team has started that nobody owns, put a name on it, and set a date to look at whether it is being used.
What new process does your team have that nobody owns?
Sources
- Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., et al. (2009). A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(5), 491–499.
- Urbach, D. R., Govindarajan, A., Saskin, R., Wilton, A. S., & Baxter, N. N. (2014). Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(11), 1029–1038.
Research describes what studies found. It is not a promise of results.
